You say:
• The term sexual ageplay doesn't exist. Now you say it exists, but is used incorrectly.
• Ageplay is not 100 percent sexual. Which means some percent of it is.
• Ageplay is "between two people who are adult's and look like adults" but now you say, "Ageplay is with two adult people who look like adults with childish clothes on." But someone with childish clothes on does not look like an adult. Someone with a diaper, a binky, stuffed animals, coloring books, and the like, does not look like an adult. Someone dressed like a teen or tween does not look like an adult. Not looking like an adult is an important part of ageplay.
• "In the real life community, we never once have used that word."
However, Fetlife, (established in 2008, and in less than ten years, had a real-life community of six million users) has:
• A "kinktionary" listing "ageplay." It explains that "age play can include sexual elements, or it can be completely non-sexual."
• A list of fetishes, including sexual ageplay. 1,897 kinksters say they are into or curious about it.
• 2,000 ageplay groups.
• One group is named "100% NON-sexual ageplay." Why? Because some of the other 1,999 ageplay groups. in Fetlife include sexual ageplayers. To list but two examples, Fetlife has:
• A group explicitly named "naughty / sexual ageplay."
• A group named "Dark Ageplay," which the group owner says is about, among other activities, sexual ageplay.
The term sexual ageplay most certainly exists, in-world and out-of-world. Is it being used incorrectly in discussions on this site? Well, just about everything else you have said so far has been corrected by the facts. What else are you wrong about? I suggest that there are more important things to discuss than the meaning, existence, and use of the term "sexual ageplay".
like(0)