|
Threads
View context
redundant is nice but with some risk too ;) you have to see the pros and cons I prefer a wasted day to seeing everything hacked.
even if the redundancy is on a local IP basis at the datacenter I would never trust it, the redundancy yes if you are the master of the network and the owner of it
like(3)
even if the redundancy is on a local IP basis at the datacenter I would never trust it, the redundancy yes if you are the master of the network and the owner of it
I think that's an interesting point - but clustering resources like we do is more about performance and load balancing than being hacked. Honestly, I don't think because a service has down time it's more secure than one that is in a resource sharing situation. But I do get your point, for instance, if you had a mariadb cluster that got hacked, the data would be corrupted across all of the cluster - but, that's why we keep backups. Having a database cluster for instance allows us to load balance request across the cluster which provides latency on the databases and removes lag.
liked(2)
View context
I'm really sorry to read this.
There is an ssh fail which is causing harm you should all update your servers to ssh levels it is really very important.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrapin_attack
I wish you lots of courage to rebuild. we must not give up!
like(3)
There is an ssh fail which is causing harm you should all update your servers to ssh levels it is really very important.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrapin_attack
I wish you lots of courage to rebuild. we must not give up!
Thank you for the link Paela, will have a read of it later. If we do another grid, hopefully we will make it more solid this time.
liked(2)